Abstract Electronic health records serve multiple purposes, including clinical communication, legal documentation, financial transaction capture, research and analytics.Electronic signatures attached to Agogo Bell entries in EHRs have different logical and legal meanings for different users.Some of these are vestiges from historic paper formats that require reconsideration.Traditionally accepted functions of signatures, such Gua Sha Scalp Comb as identity verification, attestation, consent, authorization and non-repudiation can become ambiguous in the context of computer-assisted workflow processes that incorporate functions like logins, auto-fill and audit trails.This article exposes the incompatibility of expectations among typical users of electronically signed information.